Super cena

Perceived Fairness of an Ethnic Validation Procedure - Oxendine David B.

Name: Perceived Fairness of an Ethnic Validation Procedure - Oxendine David B.
Availability: InStock

+ Dodaj do porównania Dodaj do listy zakupowej

Rozmiar

uniwersalny

397,33 zł

/ szt.

Najniższa cena z 30 dni przed obniżką: ~~418,34 zł~~ / szt.-5%

Cena regularna: ~~400,47 zł~~ / szt.-1%

Możesz kupić także poprzez:

Produkt dostępny

Darmowa i szybka dostawa od 89,00 zł

14 dni na łatwy zwrot

Bezpieczne zakupy

Odroczone płatności. Kup teraz, zapłać za 30 dni, jeżeli nie zwrócisz

Kup teraz, zapłać później - 4 kroki

Przy wyborze formy płatności, wybierz PayPo. PayPo - kup teraz, zapłać za 30 dni

PayPo opłaci twój rachunek w sklepie.
Na stronie PayPo sprawdź swoje dane i podaj pesel.

Po otrzymaniu zakupów decydujesz co ci pasuje, a co nie. Możesz zwrócić część albo całość zamówienia - wtedy zmniejszy się też kwota do zapłaty PayPo.

W ciągu 30 dni od zakupu płacisz PayPo za swoje zakupy bez żadnych dodatkowych kosztów. Jeśli chcesz, rozkładasz swoją płatność na raty.

Procedures are used today in all areas of life including business, education, politics and as in this study to determine a group's ethnicity. American Indians are the only ethnic group that must petition to the United States government to validate legally their ethnicity. The purpose of the current study was to explore the effects of social exclusion threat negative affect on the evaluated fairness of a procedure that functions to validate ethnic membership using the Dimensional Voice Model (Bane, 1994). Participants consisted of 120 (60 = female, 60 = male) college students. The study design was a 2 (Gender) X 2 (Justification) X 3 (Procedure) factorial between-groups experimental design. Based on social exclusion theory, individuals may experience high levels of negative affect when they perceive a threat of exclusion from a group (Baumeister & Tice, 1990). It was hypothesized that a procedure designed to validate ethnic membership will result in social exclusion threat negative affect. A procedure designed to validate ethnic membership was hypothesized as being evaluated as unfair (Thibaut, Walker, LaTour, & Houlden, 1974; Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler, 1990, 1994; Tyler & Lind, 1994; Walker, LaTour, Lind, & Thibaut, 1974). Justifications (Bies, 1987a, 1987b, 1989; Bies & Moag, 1986; Bies & Shapiro, 1987, 1988; Brotheridge, 2003; Skarlicki, Folger & Gee, 2004) before the procedure was tested as the rationale for the procedure introduced as procedural justification. Of two procedural justifications, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Science Foundation (NSF) justification was hypothesized as being perceived fairer. The results suggest that procedures designed to validate ethnic membership were evaluated as unfair. Additionally, the results indicated that procedural justifications might affect perceptions of fairness of the procedure. The data strongly supports the notion that these procedures may create an environment of negative affect with respondents evaluating the procedures as unfair. Implications for Lumbee Federal Recognition are discussed.

EAN: 9783836426312

Kod produktu

755EXL03527KS

Autorzy

Oxendine David B.

Rok wydania

2007

Elementy

192

Format

17.0x24.4cm

Język

angielski